<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>High Definition for PC &#187; Multibridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/tag/multibridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog</link>
	<description>Evolving Media Post Production Workflows in Light of Advancing Computer Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 04:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2K Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2K I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSDL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are much fewer monitoring options if your workflow requires full 2K resolution monitoring.  The primary reason for this is that most consumer gear and broadcast equipment all top out at 1920&#215;1080.  The HD-SDI and HDMI interfaces are both limited to 1080p in most cases as well.  HSDL (High Speed Data Link) is an older standard, developed specifically for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are much fewer monitoring options if your workflow requires full 2K resolution monitoring.  The primary reason for this is that most consumer gear and broadcast equipment all top out at 1920&#215;1080.  The HD-SDI and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI">HDMI</a> interfaces are both limited to 1080p in most cases as well.  HSDL (High Speed Data Link) is an older standard, developed specifically for transmiting 2K image data over regular BNC cables at HS-SDI frequencies.  AJA&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_windows_xena_2K.html">Xena2Ke</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_macintosh_kona_3.html">Kona3</a> cards support HSDL, but HSDL usually runs at 15fps, and is therefore not realtime, and not a useful option for monitoring.  <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMPTE_372M">Dual link HD-SDI</a> as well as the new <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMPTE_424M">3Gb/s SDI</a> are both capable of 2K, in various forms.  Certain products use 3Gb to carry full 1556 line 2K images, but most 2K hardware only supports 2048&#215;1080 resolution over SDI varients.  The other two primary connection options are <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VGA">VGA</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVI">Dual Link DVI</a>.  VGA has a maximum standard resoultion of 2048&#215;1536, although a fairly rare 2304&#215;1440 is also an option (Sony 24&#8243; CRT).  Although perfectly 4&#215;3 (1.33 aspect ratio), 1536 lines of vertical resolution is a little short of the 1556 lines of a standard 4perf full aperture 35mm film scan.  For 1.76 and 1.85 aspect ratios (1152 and 1080 vertical), VGA provides full resolution support.  Dual-Link DVI supports 2560&#215;1600 when connected to a 30&#8243; LCD, which is more than enough for every variation of 2K.  So that leaves us with four ways of driving our display: Dual-Link HD-SDI, 3Gb SDI, VGA, and DL-DVI.  Other proprietary methods exist, but will be difficult to incorporate into an Adobe based PC workflow.<br />
<span id="more-21"></span><br />
Dual-link HD-SDI supports 2K from a variety of sources, specifically the NVidia <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nvidia.com/page/qfx_4000sdi.html">QuadroFX SDI</a> cards, and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bluefish444.com/products/retail/default.asp">Bluefish444 2K|Lust</a> I/O card.  The primary display devices that support this signal format are 2K projectors, which makes sense due to the fact that almost all 2K finishing work is targeted towards theatrical projection.  Unfortunately a projector precise enough to accurately monitor color at 2K resolution is extremely expensive.  Certain high end CRT video monitors also accept this signal, but most of these eventually scale it to their native 1920 maximum horizontal width.  Sony&#8217;s new <a target="_blank" href="http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/DisplayModel?m=10007&amp;p=8&amp;sp=20073&amp;id=89766&amp;navid=master_series_video_monitors">BVML230</a> will accept 2048&#215;1080 inputs, but will scale it to 1920&#215;1080 as well.</p>
<p>3Gb SDI has very little hardware available to support it at this point.  The only real solution on the market at this point is to use Blackmagic&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/multibridge/">Multibridge</a> to generate it, and Blackmagic&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/">HDLink Pro</a> to receive it.  This solution merely converts it DL-DVI, which we will discuss below.  The Multibridge allows fullscreen 2K without depending on the workstation video card.  In the future, I expect that this standard will be widely adopted to replace dual-link SDI.  This is especially beneficial as we move towards more 4K finishes, which currently require 8 HD-SDI links to support full resolution in realtime.</p>
<p>I am not aware of any solutions allowing 2K to be displayed over VGA besides using software to output the signal from a computer graphics card.  Certain older 21-22&#8243; CRT monitors support 2K resolution, but you will need to be able to configure your software and/or your graphics driver to allow you to get fullscreen video output to the monitor.</p>
<p>Dual Link DVI can support 2K, but flat panel LCDs are the only products I am aware of that support this connection interface.  This makes it less than ideal for color grading work, but a great solution for visual effects work.  The excess resolution removes the need for dedicated full screen output, but that can usually be achieved as well.  Both computer graphics cards and the HDLink Pro can output 2K resolution over DL-DVI.  Graphics cards are obviously cheaper, and will likely work better in AE, but an HDLink Pro, with the appropriate hardware to drive it, will probably offer better performance in an NLE, like Premiere Pro.  It really depends on your budget, but if you can afford dual desktop monitors PLUS a full screen monitor, the HDLink Pro enables this configuration.</p>
<p>So those three interfaces dictate most of your actual display options in that regard.  Current <a target="_blank" href="http://www.barco.com/digitalcinema/en/products/product_specs.asp?element=3682">2K projectors</a> are driven by Dual Link SDI, but we will see DL-DVI and 3Gb SDI replacing that in the future.  2K CRT monitors can be driven via VGA connections, and LCD flat panels can support 2K and above using DL-DVI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmagic for CS3 on OSX</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decklink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a strong personal preference towards using Windows PCs over Macs running OSX.  That said, Adobe&#8217;s release of an OSX of their CS3 suite of video products has recently brought me into more frequent contact with Apple&#8217;s products.  I currently have a MacPro tower in my office, primarily for testing purposes.  Until last week, the Mac [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a strong personal preference towards using Windows PCs over Macs running OSX.  That said, Adobe&#8217;s release of an OSX of their CS3 suite of video products has recently brought me into more frequent contact with Apple&#8217;s products.  I currently have a MacPro tower in my office, primarily for testing purposes.  Until last week, the Mac version of Premiere Pro had no hardware I/O support, limiting its usefulness in professional environments.</p>
<p>Blackmagic has become the first company to support the Mac version of CS3 with their line of hardware products, with the version 6.6 release of their drivers on Oct 26.  I was aware of this at the time, but didn&#8217;t report it here until I had a chance to experiment with them myself.  I have installed a Multibridge Extreme in my MacPro and done some quick tests.  Everything seems to be in order, and most of the issues I encountered can be attributed with my lack of familiarity with the Apple way of doing things.<br />
<span id="more-19"></span><br />
The only real advantage I see Mac offering over the equivalent PC system, is that the Quicktime engine allows a greater variety of compression formats to be played in realtime through the hardware output. (For example DVCProHD)  I am hoping that this more open approach to compression support will allow Cineform compressed MOV files to be output in realtime sometime in the future, maybe even at 2K with the MultibridgePro.  I also hope to see this on PC, but the Mac Quicktime architecture currently seems one step closer to achieving this than the eventual PC solution.</p>
<p>I plan to do a more full fledged test of the HD-SDI I/O options in the near future.  So far, the only thing I have been unable to do, is get a realtime down-converted SD output of my HD timeline.  Does anyone know if this is supported, and if so, how to configure it?  I will need it to add pulldown, since most of my HD work is 23.976fps.  Since I only have an internal SATA array on the MacPro, I will not be able to push the Blackmagic hardware to its limits.  My three disks will be struggling to provide the data-rate required for 1080p 4:2:2, let alone 4:4:4 RGB or 2K.</p>
<p>UPDATE: I found the settings for downconverting, and it seems to automatically add pulldown for SD output, but I don&#8217;t see a way to add pulldown to HD output.  Unfortunately my system is currently doing a center cut to SD even when I have anamorpic or letterbox selected.  I have also been having many other playback issues, so it seems there are still a few things to be worked out.</p>
<p>One other benefit that the Blackmagic solutions provide, is that the same hardware can be used by PC applications in Windows.  This will be a significant advantage to those of you out there who are using Bootcamp to run Windows and OSX on a MacPro.  Currently Blackmagic offers the only hardware solution that publicly supports this dual environment compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portability-HD Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCIe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it is clearly possible to achieve high levels of processing performance in a portable laptop solution, the major limitation will be professional level I/O.  There are few simple solutions, but a fair number of possible work-arounds. The simplest solution that provides HD-SDI input to a laptop is the Motu V3HD.  Connected via Firewire, it allows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is clearly possible to achieve high levels of processing performance in a portable laptop solution, the major limitation will be professional level I/O.  There are few simple solutions, but a fair number of possible work-arounds.</p>
<p>The simplest solution that provides HD-SDI input to a laptop is the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.v3hd.com/overview.html">Motu V3HD</a>.  Connected via Firewire, it allows capture of digital and analog High-Definition video signals at DVCPro-HD quality.  Limited to 1280 pixels in width, and 100Mb/s, this is a lower end HD solution, but bears mention none the less.  I have not personally used one, but it is supposed to be compatible with Premiere Pro CS3, as well as Final Cut Pro.  The data rate and processing requirements allow this format to be used on most high end consumer laptops, but those looking for full resolution 1920&#215;1080 solutions must look farther.</p>
<p>The next solution is currently only available to Mac users in Final Cut Pro, but is a significant  technological development.  AJA&#8217;s &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_Io_IoHD.html">I/O HD</a>&#8221; is a Firewire800 based solution that can capture and playback full resolution material, with 10bit color, in Apple&#8217;s new ProRES codec.  Although not a PC based solution, it does enable mobile users to capture high quality, full resolution footage.<br />
<span id="more-17"></span><br />
Anything beyond that will involve a bit of creativity, and what follows is highly speculative.  Newer laptops have replaced PCMCIA card slots with <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExpressCard">ExpressCard</a> slots.  The new formfactor is much simpler, and has two basicinternal variations.  The slot has pins available to interface directly into the USB subsystem (480Mb/s) or directly into the Southbridge via the PCIe x1 interface (2000Mb/s).  The PCIe interface provides an ExpressCard slot with enough bandwidth to support uncompressed HD video, at least 10bit 422 at 1080i/p.  RGB 444 might even be possible at 24fps, but that would depend on how much overhead was imposed by the interface itself, among other things.  This bandwidth has been utilized in the design of the ExpressCard option for the CalDigit HDPro, but having a single slot with the capability of transfering video at uncompressed data rates leaves us with a problem.  If the ExpressCard slot is being used to connect some form of video I/O interface, how do I connect my storage at uncompressed speeds.  Unless you find a laptop with two ExpressCard slots, you will not be able to use both at once.  I guarantee that the capture card is necessary for realtime full resolution HD acquisition, so how can we do it without using the high speed storage?  Compressing the video becomes the obvious solution.  So a capture solutionis needed that allows realtime compression, and can be jury-rigged to connect to an ExpressCard slot at PCIe x1 bandwidth.</p>
<p>A company named <a target="_blank" href="http://www.magma.com/">Magma</a> has developed a solution that really opens up the available options.  Their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.magma.com/products/pciexpress/expressbox1/index.html">ExpressBox Pro</a> product allows a PCIe card to be inserted and connected to a laptop via an ExpressCard slot.  At the very least, PCIe x1 cards can be expected to work, and ideally higher end PCIe x4 based capture cards may function properly as well.  After all, the HD video data itself is usually well under 200MB/s, depending on the specific settings and format.</p>
<p>The first option that comes to mind are the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/intensity/">Intensity</a> cards from BlackMagic Design.  They allows full resolution capture of 1080i/p at up to 10bit color in the 422 YUV colorspace, over HDMI or analog on the Intensity Pro.  Convienently, Blackmagic also makes an HD-SDI to HDMI converter, the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/">HDLink</a>, so we can use this to pump HD-SDI into the Intensity card.  Blackmagic also has a MotionJPEG codec that we can capture directly into, so it would seem that they offer a fairly complete solution to our problem.</p>
<p>Another option using the same hardware is to use <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform</a> compression, as detailed <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/TechNotes/MagmaExpressBox.htm">here</a>.  In my experience Cineform&#8217;s compression results in a higher quality final picture than Blackmagic&#8217;s current implementation of MotionJPEG codec.  The downside of using Cineform is that they don&#8217;t support live playback, out of the Intensity card the way Blackmagic&#8217;s codecs do. If you have an external monitoring device available, this can be a very helpful option when trying to edit on a small laptop screen.  To Cineform&#8217;s credit, they allow you to use the secondary display output from your laptop as a full screen video output if your graphics card supports it.</p>
<p>Our next PCIe x1 based solution is the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.matrox.com/video/products/rtx2_card/home.cfm">RT.X2</a> from Matrox.  Although I have not been able to confirm that this has ever been successfully used in this capacity, it remains a theoretical possibility.  The RT.X2 would be advantagous in that it would offload much of the compression processing from the laptop CPU to the PCIe card.  It would allow analog HD capture, but would be limited to 1440 horizontal resolution, and would allow preview via DVI or analog HD.  On the positive side, with hardware acceleration, Matrox&#8217;s MPEG I-Frame codec would probably give the best creative editing performance of any of the solutions we are examining here.  Realtime effects and exporting would be advantagous for the editing process, but the original footage acquired would not be as high quality to begin with.</p>
<p>In theory, the Magma ExpressBox could support other cards.  While the bandwidth is limited to the 2000Mb/s (200-250MB/s) of the ExpressCard&#8217;s PCIe x1 bandwidth, the phyical connector in the box is a PCIe x16 slot.  It would be interesting to know if it would support an AJA LHe or a Decklink HDPro.  The AJA card would allow 10bit capture into the Cineform ProspectHD codec at full resolution, and Decklink might allow RGB 444 capture at 24fps.</p>
<p>There is one more Blackmagic based option that I know isn&#8217;t fully developed yet, but seems very close.  The Blackmagic Multibridge is based on the same technology that allows the Magma ExpressBox to work, external PCIe.  If an ExpressCard could be fabricated that interfaced the ExpressCard PCIe x1 bus to the DVI shaped cable that the Multibridge uses, that would be a great solution.  When the first Multibridge Extreme was released, it was listed to be compatible with PCIe x1 slots, at least at SD resolutions.  PCIe x1 has the bandwidth for HD if used efficiently, and the Multibridge has many I/O options, so I think it would be the ideal portable solution.  I know it can capture to MotionJPEG, and I believe Cineform includes capabilities to capture from it into their codec as well.  I have not been able to confirm that, but it is implied on their website.</p>
<p>The last option I will mention has been discussed and rumored about for years, but I have yet to see a product hit the market.  Why not have an ExpressCard with HD-SDI I/O directly on it?  Heat will be an issue that needs to be overcome, and mini-BNC connector could be used to improve the form factor of the physical connections.  Ideally if it was a Blackmagic product, it would support live capture into MotionJPEG, Cineform, and ProRES on a Mac, for maximum possible market.  If/When it gets developed, I know it will sell well, assuming it functions correctly in an established normal workflow.  Realtime compression will be required for any laptop solution, but this doesn&#8217;t have to be accomplised in the card itself, it just has to be compatible with it being done by the CPU.  I look forward to seeing a product like this released, as it would greatly enhance the workflow for portable post-production solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmagic Multibridge</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2K I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decklink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was never all that impressed with original Multibridge from Blackmagic Design.  It was not an I/O interface for your computer, it was just a Analog to SDI convertor, both ways.  When the Multibridge Extreme was released, and with every major revision since then, computer I/O was added in a brilliant way.  Basically they embeding their Decklink electronics within [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never all that impressed with original Multibridge from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com" title="Blackmagic">Blackmagic Design</a>.  It was not an I/O interface for your computer, it was just a Analog to SDI convertor, both ways.  When the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/multibridge/" title="Multibridge">Multibridge Extreme</a> was released, and with every major revision since then, computer I/O was added in a brilliant way.  Basically they embeding their <a href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hd/" title="Decklink">Decklink</a> electronics within the breakout box, and then devised a way to tap directly into the PCIe bus.  I don&#8217;t believe they created the original concept of External PCIe, but they were the first by a long shot to market a product utilizing the concept.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.caldigit.com/HDPro.asp" title="Caldigit">Caldigit</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ciprico.com/Products/MediaVault.cfm" title="Ciprico">Ciprico</a>, among others, have recently developed drive arrays with an external RAID controller that uses the same basic connection.</p>
<p>Another major feature that the Multibridge was the first to offer, was DVI output for monitoring on an LCD in full screen independent of the graphics card.  It was also the first simple solution for monitoring 2K at fullscreen, using the DVI port to drive a 2560&#215;1600 pixel LCD.  This has been replaced by HDMI in the newest revisions, removing integrated 2K monitoring support, but that is now offered through the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/" title="HD Link Pro">HDLink Pro</a>.  The most recent version, the Multibridge Pro, can capture or convert to and from HDMI, SDI, and Analog formats.  Their newest feature is support for 3Gb/s SDI, allowing HD 4444 and 2K 444 over a single cable in realtime. (Which allows 2K preview on an 30&#8243; LCD though the HDLink Pro, which is a separate item)</p>
<p>On the PC side, they support three basic editing modes, well really two and a half.  Uncompressed is their primary format, 8 or 10bit, 422 or 444, and now 2K.  They recently added a compressed MotionJPEG codec, but they have not unlocked all of the options to vary the quality yet.  This allows the realtime capture and playback of compressed files through their I/O.  Their MotionJPEG codec is 8bit 422, and from my use, I would class it as a great codec for full rez and frame rate offline editing, if you are finishing to HD or Film.  For Web encodes or SD, it is probably fine for online work, unless you need 10bit for Digibeta.  The last option is a Capture only one, into the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform</a> codec.  I know for a fact that this works over HDMI on the Intensity card, but I have heard that all of the Blackmagic products are supported.  Blackmagic products are the only way to capture RGB over dual link SDI in realtime to the new Cineform 444 codec, and possibly even to Cineform2K.</p>
<p>There are a few disadvantages I am aware of.  Low realtime effects or rendering support in their hardware or editing modes.  They don&#8217;t support many compression schemes, MotionJPEG being somewhat limited.  The big issue in using it with Cineform is that it seems that realtime monitoring is not available from Cineform RT projects in Premiere.  Lastly, Blackmagic products are known for their reasonable prices, but not their long lifespans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
