<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>High Definition for PC &#187; Blackmagic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/tag/blackmagic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog</link>
	<description>Evolving Media Post Production Workflows in Light of Advancing Computer Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 04:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Live from NAB 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2010/04/13/live-from-nab-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2010/04/13/live-from-nab-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereoscopic 3D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So after the first two days of the show, I have finally found some time to post some info here.  By far, the most revolutionary new development announced at the show, is Avid&#8217;s new native support of Quicktime files via AMA in Media Composer 5, which is scheduled to be released on June 10th.  This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after the first two days of the show, I have finally found some time to post some info here.  By far, the most revolutionary new development announced at the show, is Avid&#8217;s new native support of <a href="http://www.avid.com/us/solutions/workflow/Avid-Media-Access" target="_blank">Quicktime files via AMA </a>in <a href="http://www.avid.com/US/products/Media-Composer-Software/features" target="_blank">Media Composer 5</a>, which is scheduled to be released on June 10th.  This will effectively eliminate the need for a lengthy conversion process to DNXHD upon import of any Quicktime files.  The primary uses I see for this capability are for native editing of Canon DSLR MOV files which are explicitely supported, even with speed changes and effects, and for live support of <a href="http://cineform.com/neo3d/" target="_blank">Cineform&#8217;s</a> active metadata updates, to impliment non-destructive color and stereoscopic 3D workflows.  It also supports native playback of Red R3D files, and hardware outputs from <a href="http://www.matrox.com/video/en/products/mac/mxo2_family/mxo2_mini/avid/" target="_blank">Matrox MXO2</a> devices.<br />
<span id="more-81"></span><br />
<a href="http://www.decklink.com/" target="_blank">Blackmagic Design</a> has a whole selection of new products, the most significant of which is a thousand dollar software only version of their newly acquired <a href="http://www.decklink.com/davinci/resolve/" target="_blank">DaVinci Resolve </a>toolset.  The software runs on a MacPro with an NVidia GeForce 285 GTX GPU and a Decklink SDI card, and supports the Tangent Wave panel as a hardware inferface.  This release will really shake up the desktop DI market.  Blackmagic also introduced a series of USB 3.0 connected external I/O boxes including a laptop compatible <a href="http://www.decklink.com/products/ultrascope/" target="_blank">Ultrascope</a> for onset monitoring.  They also released a couple of 3D compatible products, and a new generation of 3G SDI matrix switchers to their <a href="http://www.decklink.com/products/videohub/" target="_blank">VideoHub</a> lineup.</p>
<p>Adobe announced all of the features of the new highly anticipated <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/production/" target="_blank">Creative Suite CS5</a>, which will include native 64bit, CUDA GPU acceleration, and better support for formats like DPX and DSLR clips.  I will have many more CS5 details in future posts, delving into how that will change the landscape of many workflows.  There are lots more new developments in the post world, but those are the primary things that stick out to me right now.  We still have two more days, and I will be spending a good bit of time demonstration Cineform&#8217;s <a href="http://cineform.com/neo3d/" target="_blank">Neo3D</a> features at their booth at the back of the Lower South Hall.  So if anyone wants to catch up with me, feel free to stop by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2010/04/13/live-from-nab-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAB Day 1</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2009/04/20/nab-day-1-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2009/04/20/nab-day-1-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereoscopic 3D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2009/04/20/nab-day-1-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So after a long run of dry months, with few releases of new hardware and software, NAB has brought all sorts of new toys to the table.  While I am spending most of my time as a demo artist at the Cineform booth, I did manage to take a look around at what a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after a long run of dry months, with few releases of new hardware and software, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nabshow.com/">NAB</a> has brought all sorts of new toys to the table.  While I am spending most of my time as a demo artist at the Cineform booth, I did manage to take a look around at what a few other companies were showing nearby.<br />
<span id="more-42"></span><br />
First off, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform</a> is demonstrating their new <a target="_blank" href="http://cineform.com/neo3d/">Neo3D </a>workflow.  While I have always been interested in stereoscopic video production, I have not worked on a 3D project in 4 years.  The tools have definitely advanced a lot since then.  Once development is complete, Neo3D will give editors and other content creation artists a simple way of working with stereoscopic assets.  Once the technical task of syncing and muxing the two streams into a single Cineform3D file is completed, the software seamlessly manages the separate streams in the background, presenting Left, Right, or some stitched variation to the requesting program.   It can create SideBySide, Stacked, Interleaved, or <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaglyph_image">Anaglyphic</a> versions on the fly, depending on what type of image the display requires.  It can also compensate for vertical alignment and rotational variation and tonal differences between the streams, rendered on the fly, as well as change the point of optical convergence, all based on user editable Active Metadata.  It works in FCP, so I am to seeing the same functionality on the PC in the near future.  Now I just have to find a 3D project to use it on.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com">Blackmagic Design</a> has a lot of new products available, many utilizing SDI over fibre optic cable.  It is a pretty straightforward idea, but since fibre is even more expensive than BNC cables, I personally will have little use for it in the near future.  Their new <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/ultrascope/">UltraScope</a> product is very exciting, and if it works as well as advertised, fills a big hole in the market.  Most other HD-SDI scope products are in the five figure range, so a $700 solution will be a very welcome option.  They also have two new variations to their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/videohub/">Videohub</a> line, the Enterprise version with 144/288 I/O channels, and the more reasonable Studio version with 16/32 channels.  I have filled our old 12/24 channel original model Videohub at Bandito Brothers to capacity with about 8 edit stations and the supporting equipment.  But between having 33% more connections, and 3Gb SDI support to avoid wasting two channels at a time, the new version would probably support facilities twice as large.</p>
<p>Thats all for now, as I have to prepare for another big day, but I will be checking in with my friends at AJA, Matrox, Sony, and maybe even Avid over the course of the week here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2009/04/20/nab-day-1-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAB Day 1</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2008/04/14/nab-day-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2008/04/14/nab-day-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XDCam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2008/04/14/nab-day-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the NAB exhibition opened to the public today, and I spent the majority of the day at my post as a demo artist for Cineform.  Honestly the day seemed to go by much more quickly than I anticipated.  I did get a chance to look over a few other booths, and noticed a couple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the NAB exhibition opened to the public today, and I spent the majority of the day at my post as a demo artist for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform</a>.  Honestly the day seemed to go by much more quickly than I anticipated.  I did get a chance to look over a few other booths, and noticed a couple items of interest.</p>
<p>Blackmagic has a number of new mini-convertors for analog component HD, HDMI, and HD-SDI, as well as an updated and expanded Video hub. The new &#8220;Broadcast&#8221; <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/videohub/">Video Hub </a>is in a whole new category, increasing sixfold from 12&#215;24 to 72&#215;144 inputs/outputs, while adding support for 3Gb SDI.  They also released the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/videorecorder/">BlackMagic Video Recorder</a>, a micro sized H264-encoding HD capture device that offers component HD, and optionally SDI input, connected via USB.</p>
<p>Adobe has released another update for <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/">Premiere Pro CS3</a>, so now we are at 3.2.0.  Among other smaller items, this update adds native support for XDCam-HD, and XDCam-EX, in all standard formats.  Adobe was much quicker to support Sony&#8217;s SxS solid state recording format than they were Panasonic&#8217;s P2 solid state format that had been out for two years.  On that note, I personally prefer the Sony varient for a number of reasons: modern ExpressCard interface, high transfer rate, 1080p cameras, etc.  Now we just need larger and much cheaper SxS cards.</p>
<p>Although I have yet to personally make it to that hall, I hear that Sony has a couple of cool new toys.  The <a target="_blank" href="http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/minisites/NAB2008/NAB2008_pmwex3.shtml">PMW-EX3 </a>extends their XDCam-EX line with a second model that adds support for interchangable lenses, capable of interfacing its 1/2&#8243; imager with both 1/2&#8243; and 2/3&#8243; HD lenses.  There is also an XDCam-EX VTR, the <a target="_blank" href="http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/minisites/NAB2008/NAB2008_pmwex30.shtml">EX30</a>, which I anticipated was coming, but it seems that it is physically larger than I was hoping.  The EX format lends itself well to the creation of a small scale HD-SDI recording and playback device, which would pair well with a tiny HD-SDI camera.  They also seem to have finally finished their new XDCam-HD camera that records their new <a target="_blank" href="http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/markets/10014/docs/PDW700_HD1500_broch.pdf">MPEG2-422 </a>format to XD.   I expect that new 50Mb/s XDCam format will eventually be a broadcast HDCam replacement.  No 24p support there, so I won&#8217;t be using that format for a while, but we have seen that pattern before, and it will arrive eventually.</p>
<p> Red also released details on their future products, but they aren&#8217;t due out until early 2009, so I will discuss those at a later date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2008/04/14/nab-day-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2K Cineform 444</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/12/14/2k-cineform-444/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/12/14/2k-cineform-444/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2K I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/12/14/2k-cineform-444/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Cineform&#8217;s initial products were developed for broadcast-level HD 10bit 4:2:2 YUV editing, they have added many other features to their compression format, many of which I have had the opportunity to take advantage of during my last few projects.  One of the first improvements that was made over a year ago was an increase in the maximum frame size, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform&#8217;s</a> initial products were developed for broadcast-level HD 10bit 4:2:2 <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YUV">YUV</a> editing, they have added many other features to their compression format, many of which I have had the opportunity to take advantage of during my last few projects.  One of the first improvements that was made over a year ago was an increase in the maximum frame size, from 1080p to 2K.</p>
<p>Originally the only way to generate Cineform AVI files at this resolution was to scan film to <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPX">DPXs</a>, and then convert those image sequences, presumably in After Effects.  Interestingly, while being at 2K resolution, these files were being downsampled to YUV colorspace, which improved compression rates and performance, at the expense of the quality certain color information.  Eventually the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.siliconimaging.com/DigitalCinema/SI_2Kmini_key_features.html">SI-2K</a> camera provided a second root source of Cineform2K imagery, that did not involve converting from an uncompressed source file at any point in the process.  I anticipate we will see 2K data being captured over SDI directly to Cineform files in the near future, if they are not doing so already, as both <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_windows_xena_2K.html">AJA</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/multibridge/quality/">BMD</a> have products with the required hardware capability.</p>
<p>The SI-2K brought with it one other new option to the format, which was an alternate pre-debayer <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raw_image_format">RAW</a> &#8216;colorspace&#8217; instead of the YUV data that was normally being compressed.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/technology/CineForm_RAW.htm">CineformRAW</a> video files had even better compression ratios, but the only way to take advantage of the benefits of pre-debayered images was by tapping directly into a single sensor imager, as the SI-2K did.  This eventually led to a third underlying option, with the development of Cineform 444.<br />
<span id="more-26"></span><br />
Cineform444 allows full <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB">RGB</a> encoding, processing, and mastering of image data, which is the norm in a digital intermediate environment.  The RAW files of the SI-2K had the required information for RGB processing, but it hadn&#8217;t been fully taken advantage of until that point.  DPX filmscans have full RGB info, as do most still images and CGI files.  Only &#8216;broadcast video&#8217; files and formats are limited to YUV.  While increasing file sizes and processing requirements, this RGB processing brought the &#8220;Cineform Intermediate&#8221; to the next level quality wise.  Cineform now shows off their format in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/technology/12Bit-RGB-QualityAnalysis/12Bit-RGB-QualityAnalysis.htm">comparison</a> the the popular <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDCAM_SR#HDCAM_SR">HDCam-SR</a> format, which doesn&#8217;t directly compare since SR can&#8217;t be accessed natively, but it communicates the idea to people who still think in terms of tape formats.  I believe SR tapes that are recorded in 444 RGB can be captured directly to Cineform444 via BMD hardware, but I have not had the opportunity to test that myself.  I have worked on projects where we captured 444 RGB data uncompressed through a BMD Multibridge, and then later converted parts to Cineform444 to work with.  I have also extracted CineformRAW files from the SI-2K directly to full range Cineform444 files.  Either way, this workflow has allowed me to work on visual effects shots at full 2K resolution in RGB, on my system at home without a dedicated RAID, and even on my laptop if I could suffer the 12inch screen size.</p>
<p>Around the same time that the Cineform444 capabilites were being developed, the option to include an imbedded alpha channel was added, and the maximum bit depth was increased from 10bit to 12bit.  I have yet to take advantage of the 12bit capability, but the embedded alpha channel can be useful for everything from animated titles to visual effects.  I find the biggest gains from this development when using Cineform for my After Effects work.</p>
<p>Cineform has also been working to develop a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/MacOS.htm">cross-platform</a> solution, so that Cineform compressed media can be easily shared between Macs and PCs.  Their first step was to develop a Quicktime wrapper for their original AVI codec.  Next, they ported the compression codec to OSX, assisted I am sure, by Apple&#8217;s switch to Intel processors.  The last steps remaining to be completed are an accelerated CineformRT engine for the new Mac version of PremierePro CS3, and an OSX port of their HDLink conversion tool.  At this point Cineform is the only reliable compressed format for transfering video between Windows and OSX systems, besides saving to a DPX sequence, which has obvious disadvantages.</p>
<p>As mentioned in an earlier post, Cineform has recently released a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/Downloads/DownloadP4KTrialStart.htm">beta</a> of their next improvement to the capabilities of their format, with support for 4K imagery, or higher.  Although 4K filmscans could be used as source, their immediate target is data from the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.red.com/cameras">Red One</a> camera, with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/TechNotes/Red-Prospect4K.htm">4K output</a> from the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/TechNotes/RedcineExports.htm">RedCine</a> conversion utility.  With wavelet compression for efficient reduced resolution decoding, RGB colorspace, 10 or 12bits of color depth, support for alpha channels, and cross platform compatibilty, Cineform seems well positioned to meet the needs of this emerging market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/12/14/2k-cineform-444/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2K Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2K I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSDL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are much fewer monitoring options if your workflow requires full 2K resolution monitoring.  The primary reason for this is that most consumer gear and broadcast equipment all top out at 1920&#215;1080.  The HD-SDI and HDMI interfaces are both limited to 1080p in most cases as well.  HSDL (High Speed Data Link) is an older standard, developed specifically for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are much fewer monitoring options if your workflow requires full 2K resolution monitoring.  The primary reason for this is that most consumer gear and broadcast equipment all top out at 1920&#215;1080.  The HD-SDI and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI">HDMI</a> interfaces are both limited to 1080p in most cases as well.  HSDL (High Speed Data Link) is an older standard, developed specifically for transmiting 2K image data over regular BNC cables at HS-SDI frequencies.  AJA&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_windows_xena_2K.html">Xena2Ke</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_macintosh_kona_3.html">Kona3</a> cards support HSDL, but HSDL usually runs at 15fps, and is therefore not realtime, and not a useful option for monitoring.  <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMPTE_372M">Dual link HD-SDI</a> as well as the new <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMPTE_424M">3Gb/s SDI</a> are both capable of 2K, in various forms.  Certain products use 3Gb to carry full 1556 line 2K images, but most 2K hardware only supports 2048&#215;1080 resolution over SDI varients.  The other two primary connection options are <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VGA">VGA</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVI">Dual Link DVI</a>.  VGA has a maximum standard resoultion of 2048&#215;1536, although a fairly rare 2304&#215;1440 is also an option (Sony 24&#8243; CRT).  Although perfectly 4&#215;3 (1.33 aspect ratio), 1536 lines of vertical resolution is a little short of the 1556 lines of a standard 4perf full aperture 35mm film scan.  For 1.76 and 1.85 aspect ratios (1152 and 1080 vertical), VGA provides full resolution support.  Dual-Link DVI supports 2560&#215;1600 when connected to a 30&#8243; LCD, which is more than enough for every variation of 2K.  So that leaves us with four ways of driving our display: Dual-Link HD-SDI, 3Gb SDI, VGA, and DL-DVI.  Other proprietary methods exist, but will be difficult to incorporate into an Adobe based PC workflow.<br />
<span id="more-21"></span><br />
Dual-link HD-SDI supports 2K from a variety of sources, specifically the NVidia <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nvidia.com/page/qfx_4000sdi.html">QuadroFX SDI</a> cards, and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bluefish444.com/products/retail/default.asp">Bluefish444 2K|Lust</a> I/O card.  The primary display devices that support this signal format are 2K projectors, which makes sense due to the fact that almost all 2K finishing work is targeted towards theatrical projection.  Unfortunately a projector precise enough to accurately monitor color at 2K resolution is extremely expensive.  Certain high end CRT video monitors also accept this signal, but most of these eventually scale it to their native 1920 maximum horizontal width.  Sony&#8217;s new <a target="_blank" href="http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/DisplayModel?m=10007&amp;p=8&amp;sp=20073&amp;id=89766&amp;navid=master_series_video_monitors">BVML230</a> will accept 2048&#215;1080 inputs, but will scale it to 1920&#215;1080 as well.</p>
<p>3Gb SDI has very little hardware available to support it at this point.  The only real solution on the market at this point is to use Blackmagic&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/multibridge/">Multibridge</a> to generate it, and Blackmagic&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/">HDLink Pro</a> to receive it.  This solution merely converts it DL-DVI, which we will discuss below.  The Multibridge allows fullscreen 2K without depending on the workstation video card.  In the future, I expect that this standard will be widely adopted to replace dual-link SDI.  This is especially beneficial as we move towards more 4K finishes, which currently require 8 HD-SDI links to support full resolution in realtime.</p>
<p>I am not aware of any solutions allowing 2K to be displayed over VGA besides using software to output the signal from a computer graphics card.  Certain older 21-22&#8243; CRT monitors support 2K resolution, but you will need to be able to configure your software and/or your graphics driver to allow you to get fullscreen video output to the monitor.</p>
<p>Dual Link DVI can support 2K, but flat panel LCDs are the only products I am aware of that support this connection interface.  This makes it less than ideal for color grading work, but a great solution for visual effects work.  The excess resolution removes the need for dedicated full screen output, but that can usually be achieved as well.  Both computer graphics cards and the HDLink Pro can output 2K resolution over DL-DVI.  Graphics cards are obviously cheaper, and will likely work better in AE, but an HDLink Pro, with the appropriate hardware to drive it, will probably offer better performance in an NLE, like Premiere Pro.  It really depends on your budget, but if you can afford dual desktop monitors PLUS a full screen monitor, the HDLink Pro enables this configuration.</p>
<p>So those three interfaces dictate most of your actual display options in that regard.  Current <a target="_blank" href="http://www.barco.com/digitalcinema/en/products/product_specs.asp?element=3682">2K projectors</a> are driven by Dual Link SDI, but we will see DL-DVI and 3Gb SDI replacing that in the future.  2K CRT monitors can be driven via VGA connections, and LCD flat panels can support 2K and above using DL-DVI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/14/2k-monitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmagic for CS3 on OSX</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decklink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a strong personal preference towards using Windows PCs over Macs running OSX.  That said, Adobe&#8217;s release of an OSX of their CS3 suite of video products has recently brought me into more frequent contact with Apple&#8217;s products.  I currently have a MacPro tower in my office, primarily for testing purposes.  Until last week, the Mac [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a strong personal preference towards using Windows PCs over Macs running OSX.  That said, Adobe&#8217;s release of an OSX of their CS3 suite of video products has recently brought me into more frequent contact with Apple&#8217;s products.  I currently have a MacPro tower in my office, primarily for testing purposes.  Until last week, the Mac version of Premiere Pro had no hardware I/O support, limiting its usefulness in professional environments.</p>
<p>Blackmagic has become the first company to support the Mac version of CS3 with their line of hardware products, with the version 6.6 release of their drivers on Oct 26.  I was aware of this at the time, but didn&#8217;t report it here until I had a chance to experiment with them myself.  I have installed a Multibridge Extreme in my MacPro and done some quick tests.  Everything seems to be in order, and most of the issues I encountered can be attributed with my lack of familiarity with the Apple way of doing things.<br />
<span id="more-19"></span><br />
The only real advantage I see Mac offering over the equivalent PC system, is that the Quicktime engine allows a greater variety of compression formats to be played in realtime through the hardware output. (For example DVCProHD)  I am hoping that this more open approach to compression support will allow Cineform compressed MOV files to be output in realtime sometime in the future, maybe even at 2K with the MultibridgePro.  I also hope to see this on PC, but the Mac Quicktime architecture currently seems one step closer to achieving this than the eventual PC solution.</p>
<p>I plan to do a more full fledged test of the HD-SDI I/O options in the near future.  So far, the only thing I have been unable to do, is get a realtime down-converted SD output of my HD timeline.  Does anyone know if this is supported, and if so, how to configure it?  I will need it to add pulldown, since most of my HD work is 23.976fps.  Since I only have an internal SATA array on the MacPro, I will not be able to push the Blackmagic hardware to its limits.  My three disks will be struggling to provide the data-rate required for 1080p 4:2:2, let alone 4:4:4 RGB or 2K.</p>
<p>UPDATE: I found the settings for downconverting, and it seems to automatically add pulldown for SD output, but I don&#8217;t see a way to add pulldown to HD output.  Unfortunately my system is currently doing a center cut to SD even when I have anamorpic or letterbox selected.  I have also been having many other playback issues, so it seems there are still a few things to be worked out.</p>
<p>One other benefit that the Blackmagic solutions provide, is that the same hardware can be used by PC applications in Windows.  This will be a significant advantage to those of you out there who are using Bootcamp to run Windows and OSX on a MacPro.  Currently Blackmagic offers the only hardware solution that publicly supports this dual environment compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/11/02/blackmagic-for-cs3-on-osx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portability-HD Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCIe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it is clearly possible to achieve high levels of processing performance in a portable laptop solution, the major limitation will be professional level I/O.  There are few simple solutions, but a fair number of possible work-arounds. The simplest solution that provides HD-SDI input to a laptop is the Motu V3HD.  Connected via Firewire, it allows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is clearly possible to achieve high levels of processing performance in a portable laptop solution, the major limitation will be professional level I/O.  There are few simple solutions, but a fair number of possible work-arounds.</p>
<p>The simplest solution that provides HD-SDI input to a laptop is the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.v3hd.com/overview.html">Motu V3HD</a>.  Connected via Firewire, it allows capture of digital and analog High-Definition video signals at DVCPro-HD quality.  Limited to 1280 pixels in width, and 100Mb/s, this is a lower end HD solution, but bears mention none the less.  I have not personally used one, but it is supposed to be compatible with Premiere Pro CS3, as well as Final Cut Pro.  The data rate and processing requirements allow this format to be used on most high end consumer laptops, but those looking for full resolution 1920&#215;1080 solutions must look farther.</p>
<p>The next solution is currently only available to Mac users in Final Cut Pro, but is a significant  technological development.  AJA&#8217;s &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.aja.com/html/products_Io_IoHD.html">I/O HD</a>&#8221; is a Firewire800 based solution that can capture and playback full resolution material, with 10bit color, in Apple&#8217;s new ProRES codec.  Although not a PC based solution, it does enable mobile users to capture high quality, full resolution footage.<br />
<span id="more-17"></span><br />
Anything beyond that will involve a bit of creativity, and what follows is highly speculative.  Newer laptops have replaced PCMCIA card slots with <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExpressCard">ExpressCard</a> slots.  The new formfactor is much simpler, and has two basicinternal variations.  The slot has pins available to interface directly into the USB subsystem (480Mb/s) or directly into the Southbridge via the PCIe x1 interface (2000Mb/s).  The PCIe interface provides an ExpressCard slot with enough bandwidth to support uncompressed HD video, at least 10bit 422 at 1080i/p.  RGB 444 might even be possible at 24fps, but that would depend on how much overhead was imposed by the interface itself, among other things.  This bandwidth has been utilized in the design of the ExpressCard option for the CalDigit HDPro, but having a single slot with the capability of transfering video at uncompressed data rates leaves us with a problem.  If the ExpressCard slot is being used to connect some form of video I/O interface, how do I connect my storage at uncompressed speeds.  Unless you find a laptop with two ExpressCard slots, you will not be able to use both at once.  I guarantee that the capture card is necessary for realtime full resolution HD acquisition, so how can we do it without using the high speed storage?  Compressing the video becomes the obvious solution.  So a capture solutionis needed that allows realtime compression, and can be jury-rigged to connect to an ExpressCard slot at PCIe x1 bandwidth.</p>
<p>A company named <a target="_blank" href="http://www.magma.com/">Magma</a> has developed a solution that really opens up the available options.  Their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.magma.com/products/pciexpress/expressbox1/index.html">ExpressBox Pro</a> product allows a PCIe card to be inserted and connected to a laptop via an ExpressCard slot.  At the very least, PCIe x1 cards can be expected to work, and ideally higher end PCIe x4 based capture cards may function properly as well.  After all, the HD video data itself is usually well under 200MB/s, depending on the specific settings and format.</p>
<p>The first option that comes to mind are the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/intensity/">Intensity</a> cards from BlackMagic Design.  They allows full resolution capture of 1080i/p at up to 10bit color in the 422 YUV colorspace, over HDMI or analog on the Intensity Pro.  Convienently, Blackmagic also makes an HD-SDI to HDMI converter, the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/">HDLink</a>, so we can use this to pump HD-SDI into the Intensity card.  Blackmagic also has a MotionJPEG codec that we can capture directly into, so it would seem that they offer a fairly complete solution to our problem.</p>
<p>Another option using the same hardware is to use <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform</a> compression, as detailed <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/TechNotes/MagmaExpressBox.htm">here</a>.  In my experience Cineform&#8217;s compression results in a higher quality final picture than Blackmagic&#8217;s current implementation of MotionJPEG codec.  The downside of using Cineform is that they don&#8217;t support live playback, out of the Intensity card the way Blackmagic&#8217;s codecs do. If you have an external monitoring device available, this can be a very helpful option when trying to edit on a small laptop screen.  To Cineform&#8217;s credit, they allow you to use the secondary display output from your laptop as a full screen video output if your graphics card supports it.</p>
<p>Our next PCIe x1 based solution is the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.matrox.com/video/products/rtx2_card/home.cfm">RT.X2</a> from Matrox.  Although I have not been able to confirm that this has ever been successfully used in this capacity, it remains a theoretical possibility.  The RT.X2 would be advantagous in that it would offload much of the compression processing from the laptop CPU to the PCIe card.  It would allow analog HD capture, but would be limited to 1440 horizontal resolution, and would allow preview via DVI or analog HD.  On the positive side, with hardware acceleration, Matrox&#8217;s MPEG I-Frame codec would probably give the best creative editing performance of any of the solutions we are examining here.  Realtime effects and exporting would be advantagous for the editing process, but the original footage acquired would not be as high quality to begin with.</p>
<p>In theory, the Magma ExpressBox could support other cards.  While the bandwidth is limited to the 2000Mb/s (200-250MB/s) of the ExpressCard&#8217;s PCIe x1 bandwidth, the phyical connector in the box is a PCIe x16 slot.  It would be interesting to know if it would support an AJA LHe or a Decklink HDPro.  The AJA card would allow 10bit capture into the Cineform ProspectHD codec at full resolution, and Decklink might allow RGB 444 capture at 24fps.</p>
<p>There is one more Blackmagic based option that I know isn&#8217;t fully developed yet, but seems very close.  The Blackmagic Multibridge is based on the same technology that allows the Magma ExpressBox to work, external PCIe.  If an ExpressCard could be fabricated that interfaced the ExpressCard PCIe x1 bus to the DVI shaped cable that the Multibridge uses, that would be a great solution.  When the first Multibridge Extreme was released, it was listed to be compatible with PCIe x1 slots, at least at SD resolutions.  PCIe x1 has the bandwidth for HD if used efficiently, and the Multibridge has many I/O options, so I think it would be the ideal portable solution.  I know it can capture to MotionJPEG, and I believe Cineform includes capabilities to capture from it into their codec as well.  I have not been able to confirm that, but it is implied on their website.</p>
<p>The last option I will mention has been discussed and rumored about for years, but I have yet to see a product hit the market.  Why not have an ExpressCard with HD-SDI I/O directly on it?  Heat will be an issue that needs to be overcome, and mini-BNC connector could be used to improve the form factor of the physical connections.  Ideally if it was a Blackmagic product, it would support live capture into MotionJPEG, Cineform, and ProRES on a Mac, for maximum possible market.  If/When it gets developed, I know it will sell well, assuming it functions correctly in an established normal workflow.  Realtime compression will be required for any laptop solution, but this doesn&#8217;t have to be accomplised in the card itself, it just has to be compatible with it being done by the CPU.  I look forward to seeing a product like this released, as it would greatly enhance the workflow for portable post-production solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/26/portability-hd-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portability-HD Editing</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/25/portability-hd-editing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/25/portability-hd-editing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCIe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/25/portability-hd-editing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of discussion recently on the reduser.net and dvinfo.net among other places, about portable HD editing systems.  Technically, almost any editing system is portable if you want to go to the trouble of taking it with you.  For the sake of this discussion, I am going to consider any collection of items that will comfortably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of discussion recently on the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=3">reduser.net</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/forumdisplay.php?f=11">dvinfo.net</a> among other places, about portable HD editing systems.  Technically, almost any editing system is portable if you want to go to the trouble of taking it with you.  For the sake of this discussion, I am going to consider any collection of items that will comfortably fit within a regular backpack to be a legitimate &#8221;mobile&#8221; solution. </p>
<p>Technology has come a long way in the last two years, especially in the CPU processing aspect of the equation.  A well equipt laptop can be purchased now that has more processing power than the highest-end Windows based workstations of two years ago, thanks to the Core2 Duo.  I bought a Xeon workstation in 2005, and one year later, bought a 12&#8243; notebook for LESS money, that has MORE CPU power.  With the upcoming release of quad core mobile CPUs, we can remove processing power from the list of limitations that mobility imposes.</p>
<p>Next is RAM, and we are in a unique situation in that regard.  Most systems still use 32bit OSes, and are limited to 4GB of RAM.  This software limitation has allowed notebooks to catchup with desktops in this regard, as demand has not climbed as much past 4GB in the desktop sector, and notebooks were under no similar limit until they caught up.  4GB of notebook RAM can be had for under $200.  Obviously mobile solutions will not be limited by the maximum available RAM. (Any more than a desktop)<br />
<span id="more-15"></span><br />
The first area where we encounter trouble is with storage, in both capacity and transfer rate.  While there are solutions that allow uncompressed HD speeds and capacities on a laptop (<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExpressCard">ExpressCard</a> to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.caldigit.com/HDPro.asp">CalDigit HDPro</a>), that solution is not very portable.  The capacity issue can be solved via 1TB drives connected via firewire, or internal RAIDs or 2.5inch hard disks in large laptops, but there is currently no way to provide the required transfer rates for realtime uncompressed high-resolution editing, in a mobile solution.  This leads to a need for a different solution.  We can utilize the extra CPU now available by using a compressed video format to decrease the strorage requirements.  (As an aside, my FREE IDEA of the day is: A mobile array of 8x250GB 2.5 inch disks with an external PCIe interface for use with x1 PCIe or ExpressCards would offer 2TB at 250MB/s.  It would be an interesting solution, and if a company decided to create it, all the technology already exists.)</p>
<p> Since there are no reasonable storage solutions for uncompressed, we must examine compression options.  The first standardized option is <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV">HDV</a>.  The advantages are low-bitrate, wide support, and firewire I/O, which most laptops already have available.  The disadvantages are lower quality, 8bit 4:2:0 MPEG encoding, and a 1440 horizontal resolution limit.  The next option is a very recent one for Premiere Pro users, with DVCPro-HD, made possible by the release of the 3.1.0 update this week.  With datarates of 5-12Mb/s, this format is will within the 30MB/s capabilities of a single 2.5inch laptop drive.  The horizontal resolution is even more limited, to 1280 pixels wide, but it encodes 8bit 4:2:2 with DCT compression, and in general a higher bitrate should improve quality.  Since it doesn&#8217;t use MPEG compression, it should be less CPU intensive to playback and edit, leading to better performance.  The next step would probably be one of Cineform&#8217;s products.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/Aspect-Prospect.htm">AspectHD</a> is limited to 1440 at 8bit, but it still the highest quality solution yet, usually at around 9-10MB/s, using Wavelet compression, which allows efficient low resolution playback as an added bonus. </p>
<p> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com">Blackmagic Design</a> released a MotionJPEG codec a while back that allows full 1920&#215;1080 files at 8bit 4:2:2 to be used with a data rate of around 12MB/s.  The advantages are that it can be used for free, with out any limitations that I am aware of, but it is designed to be used with their I/O hardware for acquisition and preview.  The only disadvantage is not really a disadvantage comparedto the options below it, but image quality will not be as good as Cineform, and is limited to 8-bit.  Cineform&#8217;s higher-end product <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com/products/Aspect-Prospect.htm">ProspectHD</a> has few limitations, allowing 10bit 422 at full1920x1080 to be edited at around 15MB/s depending on settings.  This is easily sustainable on internal laptop disks, while an external firewire drive could increase performance and capacity.  Currently Cineform is the solution I would recommend if you need high end HD editing in a portable form factor.  The next question that Cinefrom prompts is, how high can I go, and currently 2K 444 RGB is possible at 30-40MB/s, meaning an internal RAID 0 would benefit playback on a laptop.  There is even talk of 4K realtime playback with the release of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.red.com/cameras">RedOne</a>, so it seems that the sky is the limit.</p>
<p>Other solutions that I am aware of, but don&#8217;t seem ideal are: Matrox MPEG I-Frame files from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.matrox.com/video/products/axio/home.cfm">AXIO</a> or <a target="_blank" href="http://www.matrox.com/video/products/rtx2_card/home.cfm">RT.X2</a> at 12MB/s with the Matrox M.key in desktop mode, which I use, but the performance is not good for creative work without the hardware acceleration.  In the non-Adobe world, FCP offers DVCProHD, and now recently <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProRes_422">ProRES</a>, a full frame 10bit 422 codec that runs about 15MB/s at 1080p I believe.  I have no familiarity with Avid, but XpressPro or Media Composer with <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNxHD_codec">DNxHD</a> might be a portable HD option as well.</p>
<p>Laptops have done a lot of catching up recently, and the concept of &#8221;desktop-replacement&#8221; is a much more legitimate now than it was two years ago.  The most important aspect we have not yet examined is HD I/O for portable solutions, especially for portable acquisition, which I plan to go over next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/25/portability-hd-editing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmagic HDLink &amp; Video Hub</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/13/blackmagic-hdlink-video-hub/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/13/blackmagic-hdlink-video-hub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2K I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/13/blackmagic-hdlink-video-hub/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Besides their Mac and PC compatible I/O components, Blackmagic makes a couple of utility devices that greatly increase the options available to a small post facility in using SDI video gear.  Technically, the Multibridge used to fall into this category as well, until they added PCIe support to it, totally extending its functionality. The HDLink is a small box [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides their Mac and PC compatible I/O components, Blackmagic makes a couple of utility devices that greatly increase the options available to a small post facility in using SDI video gear.  Technically, the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/multibridge/">Multibridge</a> used to fall into this category as well, until they added PCIe support to it, totally extending its functionality.</p>
<p>The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/">HDLink</a> is a small box that converts HD-SDI video signal to DVI or HDMI, for monitoring video signals at full resolution with a computer LCD screen or projector.  It supports regular 1080 and 720 in most variations, and RGB 444 over dual link SDI.  It also has stereo sound output for audio monitoring.</p>
<p>These HDLinks are in widespread use at a number of the facilities I work at, and at under $500, they are within the reach of independent editors or anyone else who needs an economical solution for monitoring SDI.  They do get hot though, so they should be powered down when not in use, and they don&#8217;t last forever.</p>
<p>The new HDLink Pro adds 3Gb/s SDI for 2K support on a single SDI cable, but lacks dual link support, which is still the most popular RGB standard.  It also adds 6 Channel Audio de-embedding to analog RCA ports for 5.1 surround sound monitoring.  I have not yet had the opportunity to try one of these out yet, but I look forward to doing so as I find myself doing more 2K work, especially now that I have a 30&#8243; LCD to connect it to.</p>
<p> Separately but related, Blackmagic&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/workgroupvideohub/">Workgroup Video Hub</a> is a 12&#215;24 SDI router.  It supports SD and HD, but currently not the 3Gb/s SDI standard that Blackmagic has been rolling out this year.  With a bit of creativity, it can easily support dual link connections, but that lowers the number of devices you can connect by half.  All patching is controlled in software via USB, which is connected to a single system, that hosts a network utility to share control with all users.  Their utility for patching as well designed and fleshed out at this point.  You can also patch through a built-in downconverter to SD, and it has a Still Store, ideal for color bars or logos.</p>
<p>We use these at three facilities I work at, and they bring a dramatic increase to the flexability and efficiency of your workflow.  They are not economical for use by a single individual, but will be well worth it in work areas shared by 3-10 people.  They greatly ease the sharing of high end video equipment.  For example, I can output any edit workstation&#8217;s SDI playout to either: a projector on an HDLink, an LCD on an HDLink, an HD CRT, our vectorscope, or any combination thereof.  Using a Video Hub can have a significant effect on your environment if you frequently find yourself reconfiguring your peripherals when switching between different projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/13/blackmagic-hdlink-video-hub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmagic Multibridge</title>
		<link>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 06:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McCarthyTech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2K I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cineform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decklink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multibridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was never all that impressed with original Multibridge from Blackmagic Design.  It was not an I/O interface for your computer, it was just a Analog to SDI convertor, both ways.  When the Multibridge Extreme was released, and with every major revision since then, computer I/O was added in a brilliant way.  Basically they embeding their Decklink electronics within [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never all that impressed with original Multibridge from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com" title="Blackmagic">Blackmagic Design</a>.  It was not an I/O interface for your computer, it was just a Analog to SDI convertor, both ways.  When the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/multibridge/" title="Multibridge">Multibridge Extreme</a> was released, and with every major revision since then, computer I/O was added in a brilliant way.  Basically they embeding their <a href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hd/" title="Decklink">Decklink</a> electronics within the breakout box, and then devised a way to tap directly into the PCIe bus.  I don&#8217;t believe they created the original concept of External PCIe, but they were the first by a long shot to market a product utilizing the concept.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.caldigit.com/HDPro.asp" title="Caldigit">Caldigit</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ciprico.com/Products/MediaVault.cfm" title="Ciprico">Ciprico</a>, among others, have recently developed drive arrays with an external RAID controller that uses the same basic connection.</p>
<p>Another major feature that the Multibridge was the first to offer, was DVI output for monitoring on an LCD in full screen independent of the graphics card.  It was also the first simple solution for monitoring 2K at fullscreen, using the DVI port to drive a 2560&#215;1600 pixel LCD.  This has been replaced by HDMI in the newest revisions, removing integrated 2K monitoring support, but that is now offered through the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.decklink.com/products/hdlink/" title="HD Link Pro">HDLink Pro</a>.  The most recent version, the Multibridge Pro, can capture or convert to and from HDMI, SDI, and Analog formats.  Their newest feature is support for 3Gb/s SDI, allowing HD 4444 and 2K 444 over a single cable in realtime. (Which allows 2K preview on an 30&#8243; LCD though the HDLink Pro, which is a separate item)</p>
<p>On the PC side, they support three basic editing modes, well really two and a half.  Uncompressed is their primary format, 8 or 10bit, 422 or 444, and now 2K.  They recently added a compressed MotionJPEG codec, but they have not unlocked all of the options to vary the quality yet.  This allows the realtime capture and playback of compressed files through their I/O.  Their MotionJPEG codec is 8bit 422, and from my use, I would class it as a great codec for full rez and frame rate offline editing, if you are finishing to HD or Film.  For Web encodes or SD, it is probably fine for online work, unless you need 10bit for Digibeta.  The last option is a Capture only one, into the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cineform.com">Cineform</a> codec.  I know for a fact that this works over HDMI on the Intensity card, but I have heard that all of the Blackmagic products are supported.  Blackmagic products are the only way to capture RGB over dual link SDI in realtime to the new Cineform 444 codec, and possibly even to Cineform2K.</p>
<p>There are a few disadvantages I am aware of.  Low realtime effects or rendering support in their hardware or editing modes.  They don&#8217;t support many compression schemes, MotionJPEG being somewhat limited.  The big issue in using it with Cineform is that it seems that realtime monitoring is not available from Cineform RT projects in Premiere.  Lastly, Blackmagic products are known for their reasonable prices, but not their long lifespans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hd4pc.com/techblog/2007/10/07/blackmagic-multibridge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
